Quote:
Originally Posted by outwest
They wouldn't show them AKC as a mini because they would have registered the litter as toys. The nice OT would be some pet homes lucky find probably. Breeders generally register the litter when born.
Yes, there are different diseases specific to the different sizes. The standards don't have nearly the drippy eye issues the smaller dogs have, for example. There are a few tests recommended for the mini/toy that aren't for the standards.
|
I am no expert, but from what I understand, you theoretically COULD show an oversized toy as a mini in the ring, however, an oversized toy (say 11 or 12 inches) is not likely to do well in the ring with minis, so most people wouldn't do this. If I am wrong, I hope that a show breeder will be able to pop in to correct me.
That said... toys, minis and standards are
supposed to be identical other than size. They all have the same breed standard. But, in reality, the three varieties are NOT all identical but for size. In addition to some of the physical differences, there are temperament differences as well. So an oversized toy from toy lines really looks like a toy, not a small mini. And an oversized mini from mini lines really looks like a mini, not a small standard. in general, of course.
And yes, the different varieties have different health issues. This is one of the biggest reasons I really dislike interbreeding the varieties. Minis and toys are FAR healthier than the standards. There are certain diseases that occur in standards that do not occur in the minis and toys.
Now that there is a genetic test for PRA, I think the biggest thing you need to worry about in minis and toys is LCP and luxating patellas (which is not life threatening and often not very dibilitating in these smaller dogs).
In standards you really have to worry more about HD, Addison's, bloat, SA... far more serious in my opinion. One of the reasons I chose the mini (among other reasons) is they are healthier and tend to live longer than standards.