plumcrazy

I've read this entire thread - several times... and I find that the topic of the thread is that a puppy died young, and the distraught owners have had little luck communicating with the breeder, so have contacted other breeders to share their sorrow and confusion.

The question was asked of this community, "what do you all think is fair?" on the continued responsibility of the breeder to a pupppy he/she bred and sold.

The breeder of the deceased puppy has not been publically mentioned on this thread, however, if a member wishes to know the identity so they can make a decision whether or not to patronize this breeder in the future - that is what private messages are for. This would not be the first time a breeder is discussed through private messages... am I wrong??

All I want to see discussed on this thread is member opinions on breeder responsibilities for communicating/recompensing their puppy clients when tragedies occur - and keep it hypothetical... this could pertain to ANY breeder's responsibilities to clients, not just the anonymous breeder discussed here. Any further discussion off topic will result in the closing of the thread and PMs sent to the people responsible.

So... back on topic please! Thank you.

Barb

ps... please read my permanent signature below!

__________________

There is no rule requiring that you attend every argument to which you're invited...